ORAL REPORT BY
ANWARUL
K. CHOWDHURY
UNDER-SECRETARY-GENERAL
AND HIGH REPRESENTATIVE
FOR
THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES,
LANDLOCKED
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
AND
SMALL ISLAND DEVELOPING STATES, OHRLLS
AT
THE
GENERAL
SEGMENT OF THE ECOSOC, UNDER AGENDA ITEM 6(B):
REVIEW
AND COORDINATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
PROGRAMME
OF ACTION FOR THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
FOR
THE DECADE 2001-2010
18
JULY 2002
UNITED
NATIONS, NEW YORK
1.
The Third UN Conference for the Least Developed
Countries (LDCs) held in Brussels in May 2001 is considered
a turning point in many ways in the development efforts of
LDCs and the international communitys support to them.
The Brussels Programme of Action for LDCs for the Decade 2001-2010
(POA) adopted there differs from the earlier programmes of
1981 and 1990 in terms of its objectives, orientation, scope
and follow-up arrangements. It provides a framework for a
strong global partnership to accelerate sustained economic
growth and sustainable development in these countries, as
well as a framework for putting an end to marginalization.
Poverty eradication, gender equality, employment, governance,
capacity building, sustainable development, special problems
of landlocked and small island countries and the challenges
faced by LDCs affected by conflict are singled out in the
POA as cross-cutting priority issues. The objective of the
POA is to achieve substantial progress towards meeting the
Millennium Declaration goal of reducing extreme poverty by
half by 2015 and promoting sustainable development.
2.
The POA is focussed on seven
specific areas of commitment; (i) fostering a people-centred
policy framework; (ii) good governance at the national and
international levels (iii) building human and institutional
capacities (iv) building productive capacities to make globalization
work for the LDCs (v) enhancing the role of trade and development
(vi) reducing vulnerability
and
protecting the environment (vii) mobilizing financial resources.
Office
of the High Representative
3.
To undertake the responsibilities related to
the follow-up, coordination, monitoring and review of the
implementation of the POA, as envisaged in its chapter III,
the Office of the High Representative for LDCs, Landlocked
Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Small Island Developing States
(SIDS) was established on the recommendation of the Secretary-General
of the United Nations by the General Assembly in its resolution
56/227 of 24 December 2001. The Office of the High Representative
(OHRLLS), located at UN headquarters in New York, aims at
enhancing the mobilization and galvanization of international
support for and ensuring the effective coordination,
monitoring and review of the implementation of the
Brussels POA.
Framework
for action
4.
Following the formal assumption of office by
the High Representative in April 2002, OHRLLS is currently
engaged in setting its direction and getting organized for
the assigned tasks. In carrying out the mandate of the General
Assembly, the Office will be working within the following
framework:
·
It will focus on country level implementation
both by the LDCs and donor countries to see
to it that they are implementing their commitments made in
the POA. The Office will work closely with the UNDG partners,
including in particular UNDP, to ensure full support of the
Resident Coordinator system to the LDCs. The UNDAF and PRSP
processes in LDCs, as applicable, need to incorporate implementation
of the POA.
·
It will work with all relevant
entities of the UN family, in particular the Funds
and Programmes, Regional Commissions, Specialized Agencies,
and the BWIs, to ensure that these entities mainstream the
Brussels POA in their activities and in their intergovernmental
processes as well as establish appropriate focal points for
review and follow-up as called for in the POA and the General
Assembly resolution 56/227.
·
It will be working with other multilateral
organizations, particularly the regional organizations
like the African Union (AU), the SAARC, the South Pacific
Forum and regional development banks, as well as the sub-regional
organizations like the SADC, ECOWAS, ASEAN, CARICOM and others,
as these organizations have LDCs as their constituents. It
is important that they focus on the development efforts of
these countries and, in particular, on the implementation
of the Brussels POA. Recent adoption of the New Partnership
for Africas Development (NEPAD) by the African Union
provides an immense opportunity for reinforcing and complementing
the development efforts in 34 African LDCs.
·
It will work closely with civil society
and private sector both national and global - so
that they are brought in as full development partners of the
LDCs. It will promote linkages with civil society including
NGOs involved in development efforts of LDCs as well as with
the private sector, academia and foundations, in an attempt
to forge closer cooperation to respond more capably to LDC
concerns.
Medium-Term
Plan
5.
The first Medium-Term Plan of the OHRLLS was
presented on 21 June 2002 to the General Assemblys Committee
for Programme and Coordination (CPC). According to the Plan
covering 2002 to 2005 as approved by the CPC, the substantive
responsibility for the follow-up and coordination for the
implementation of the Brussels POA is vested in the Office
of the High Representative.
6.
Initial activities of the
OHRLLS commenced with a three-pronged approach: (i) placing
the issue of LDCs high on the intergovernmental agenda through
appropriate legislative mandates, as needed (ii) centering
its focus on Africa, particularly in the context of NEPAD,
and (iii) supporting establishment of country-level implementation
arrangements including establishment of national forums
as envisaged in paragraph 100 of the Brussels POA.
Advocacy
and Coordination/Monitoring
7.
In undertaking effectively the responsibilities
outlined in its mandate, the OHRLLS needs to perform its coordination,
monitoring and reporting roles as functions in support of
a broader mandate to speak for the specific needs of LDCs
to highlight their concerns as well as their potentials in
a rapidly globalizing world. It would, therefore, be purposeful
to adopt advocacy as its key strategy, using monitoring and
coordination as its tools to mobilize international support
for the Brussels POA. Value could be added to the monitoring
and reporting tasks of the OHRLLS by focusing on lessons
learned and bringing to the ECOSOC - and also to the
General Assembly - specific proposals in support of LDCs.
A meta-analysis could be done of detailed monitoring
reports received from other entities to bring out the political
and pragmatic issues that need to be addressed by the international
community in support of the POA.
Role
of ECOSOC
8.
The Brussels POA has accorded a specific role
to the ECOSOC for the intergovernmental oversight of its implementation.
In its paragraph 111, the POA suggested a) creation of an
annual agenda item on the review and coordination; b) undertaking
at regular intervals such reviews at the high-level segment;
and c) effective preparations for the annual review,
inter alia, drawing on the contribution of governmental
and individual experts.
Annual
Reviews
9.
The Brussels POA, in paragraph 112, also identifies
the elements of the annual reviews. First, the review
should include follow-up, monitoring and assessment of progress
in the implementation of the POA at national, sub-regional,
regional and global levels through report by governments as
well as by all other entities concerned. Second, the
review should be fostering international cooperation in support
of the POA, including coordination among donors and among
relevant entities. Third, the review should elaborate
new policies and measures in light of changing domestic and
external circumstances facing LDCs. The POA has also invited
governing bodies of UNCTAD and WTO specifically (paragraph
113) to inform the ECOSOC about the progress made by their
respective organizations in implementing the POA. This decision
should, of course, be treated as being subsumed in the first
recommendation of paragraph 112.
Recommendations
10.
The ECOSOC in its resolution 2001/320 has decided
to incorporate an identifiable agenda-item at its current
substantive session at its General Segment on the coordination
and review of the implementation of the Brussels POA. On
the basis of this and taking into account the decisions incorporated
in the POA, it is recommended that:
a)
ECOSOC undertakes the annual review of the implementation of the Brussels
Programme of Action in the General Segment of its substantive
sessions.
b)
ECOSOC sets aside one-day specifically for the review under a separate
agenda item.
c)
The one-day review exercise should be undertaken through creative
and participatory arrangements. The format and structure
of these reviews should be decided every year at the ECOSOC
organizational session. Undertaking the review on thematic
basis may be considered, keeping in mind the seven commitments
of the Brussels POA.
d)
The Secretary-General is requested to submit a report incorporating
the information on the progress made and challenges faced
by the Member States, the United Nations and by all other
actors, including civil society, in the implementation process
of the Brussels POA at the country, regional and global levels
by all partners, the report should include his specific recommendations
and concrete measures for enhancing the effectiveness of the
implementation in future. The report should be made available
latest by last week of May each year, bearing in mind paragraph
112 of the POA.
e)
All entities of the United Nations family are invited to provide
timely inputs in their respective areas of mandate into the
preparation of the report of the Secretary-General. Other
multilateral organizations are also invited to provide timely
inputs for the report. This should be acted upon bearing
in mind paragraph 112 of the POA.
f)
All efforts must be made to
adopt an implementation-focussed outcome following the review
advising all relevant UN entities what is needed to be done
on the basis of the experience gained in the preceding year
and through identification of best practices in
the LDCs.
g)
In the context of the annual review, ECOSOC will keep in view the special
problems of landlocked and small island countries, which,
inter alia, have been identified as a cross-cutting
priority issue.
h)
ECOSOC may reiterate the invitation of the General Assembly
to organizations of the United Nations system and other multilateral
organizations to mainstream the implementation of the Brussels
Declaration and Programme of Action within their programmes
of work, as well as in their intergovernmental processes.
It should reiterate also the importance of optimal coordination
between the OHRLLS and various organizations of the United
Nations system and other multilateral organizations.
i)
ECOSOC may decide to devote,
in accordance with its resolution 2001/320, the high-level
segment of its 2004 substantive session for the review and
coordination of the implementation of the Brussels POA.
j)
Paragraph 111 of the POA mentions about the
need for effective preparation for the annual review drawing
on the contribution of the governmental and individual experts.
ECOSOC may ask the Office of the High Representative to give
practical shape to this recommendation as part of the effective
preparation for the review in 2003 and thereafter.
******
|